Skip to main content

Table 2 Criteria for the authenticity of Urzyme catalytic activities

From: The Rodin-Ohno hypothesis that two enzyme superfamilies descended from one ancestral gene: an unlikely scenario for the origins of translation that will not be dismissed

Criterion

Implementation

Remarks

Empty vector controls

Purify, assay MBP

De Rigueur, but unconvincing

Renaturation from inclusion bodies

Tagged Urzymes purified from pellet

WT Enzymes do not segregate with inclusion bodies

MBP fusions release cryptic activity on TEV cleavage.

Assay fusion proteins ± TEV cleavage

Inhibition in fusion proteins is widespread, not universal.

Active-site titrations Urzyme preparations have significant bursts.

Single turnover time-courses

A key criterion, this is also essential for comparing kcat/KM.

Mutations, modular alterations induce predictable changes in activity.

Determine effect of active-site mutations, genetic manipulations

Active-site mutations generally affect Urzyme activities differently and can actually enhance activity because mechanisms are different.

Urzymes, WT enzymes have different Steady-state KM values.

Measure: kcat, KM, kcat/KM

Contamination by WT enzyme would saturate at WT KM.

Amino acid specificity is different from full-length

Compare: (kcat/KM)W/(kcat/KM)Y

Urzymes are generally low specificity, high kcat catalysts.