Skip to main content

Table 2 Differences between predictions of the gradualistic and punctuational theories of evolution

From: Microevolutionary, macroevolutionary, ecological and taxonomical implications of punctuational theories of adaptive evolution

 

Gradualistic theories

Group I punctuational theories

Group II punctuational theories

Group III punctuational theories

Group IV punctuational theories

Group V punctuational theories

typical representative

Fisher’s model

Futuyma’s model

Wright’s model

Templeton’s model

Mayr’s model

Flegr’s model

anagenesis and cladogenesis are coupled **1, 2

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

divergence of species correlates with taxon richness 1

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

genetic polymorphism decelerates evolution **3

no

no

no

no

yes

yes

most species under usual conditions respond to selection *4

as plasiticine

as plasiticine

rather as lead than plasticine

rather as lead than plasticine

as rubber

as ruber

two species in the same niche frequently can easily coexist *

no

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

species are adapted to original environment *5

no

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

local and global abundance do not correlate for old species **6

no

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

abundance of species decreases with species age

no

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

ability of species to respond to environmental changes decreases with species age **7

no

no

no

no

yes

yes

ability of species to change taxon-characteristic traits decreases with clade age *

no

no

no

no

no

yes

species on islands are derived more than those on continents *1

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

asexual species are more adapted to their environment *8

no

no

no

yes

yes

yes

cross-pollinating species more stable than self-pollinating species *9

no

yes

no

yes

yes

yes

invasive species express higher capacity to respond selection **10

no

no

no

yes

yes

yes

domesticated species express higher capacity to respond selection

no

no

no

yes

yes

yes

domesticated species are evolutionarily younger

no

no

no

no

yes

yes

successful selection decreases fitness *11

no

no

no

no

yes

yes

evolution of altruistic behavior by group selection is easy *12

no

no

no

yes

yes

yes

phylogenetic trees usually resemble *13

tree

shrub

shrub

shrub

shrub

shrub

intraspecies variability in a clade usually decreases in time*

no

no

no

no

no

yes

interspecies variability (disparity) in a clade usually decreases *

no

no

no

no

no

yes

dead clade walking should frequently occur *

no

no

no

no

no

yes

slow long-term trends are quite possible *

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

genera and higher taxa are objective existing entities *

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

  1. Gradualistic theories include not only classical neodarwinistic (Fisherian) models but also selfish gene model of Dawkins (Dawkins 1976). The Futuyma’s model (stabilization of gradualistically developed traits by a speciation) was described in (Gould 2002), p. 77, other models are described in Tab. 1. The group II encloses the Wright’s Shifting balance model (Wright 1932) and the group III encloses the models of Carson and Templeton (Carson 1968; Templeton 1980) as the elasticity of species or the frequency dependent selection is probably not explicitly mentioned in these models. The Flegr’s frozen plasticity model (class V) differs from the Mayer’s Genetic revolution-based model (class IV) by including theory of evolutionary stable strategies for description of behavior of alleles in genetically polymorphic population and by including the conception of accumulation of permanently frozen traits by sorting for stability. Two asterisks denote the predictions that have already been tested with positive result. One asterisk denotes the predictions that have not been intentionally tested but are supported by published data. 1 (Ricklefs 2004), 2(Pagel et al. 2006), 3(Bryant et al. 1986; Mezhzherin 1997), 4 (Dobzhansky and Spassky 1969), 5(Costas et al. 1996), 6(Prinzing et al. 2004), 7(Mikulas 2008), 8(Haag and Ebert 2004; Peck et al. 1998), 9(Flegr 2002), 10 (Novak 2007; Prentis et al. 2008; Yonekura et al. 2007), 11(Bradshaw and Holzapfel 2006; Nussey et al. 2005), 12 (Kulich and Flegr 2010), 13 (Gould 2002; Heard 1992).