I thought this a very interesting paper that shed important light on the difficulties inherent in predicting structure from sequence - and in correcting earlier errors. The insights derived from the exchanges between reviewers and authors were particularly illuminating. I've mentioned the paper on my blog as an example of the great value of openness in the publication procedure.
A great example of science in action
30 March 2009
I thought this a very interesting paper that shed important light on the difficulties inherent in predicting structure from sequence - and in correcting earlier errors. The insights derived from the exchanges between reviewers and authors were particularly illuminating. I've mentioned the paper on my blog as an example of the great value of openness in the publication procedure.
Competing interests
No competing interests